Friday, March 13, 2009

President Obama's Legacy Assured By a Pen Stroke

March 9, 2009. President Obama signed an Executive Order. Restrictions on federal funding of stem cell research, put into place by former president George W. Bush, are eliminated.

In so doing, President Obama's legacy has been guaranteed. If he does nothing else of significance, history will remember him for this one simple act. He has allowed the United States of America to join with other nations, such as China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Taiwan, Switzerland, Spain, France, et cetera in researching and developing not just treatments, but permanent CURES for numerous debilitating diseases and conditions, including diabetes, Alzheimer's, heart disease, Parkinson's, spinal cord injuries, stroke, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and even severe burns. Stem cell research holds that much promise, and perhaps even more.

Here is the full text of President Obama's speech on the day he signed the Order:


"Today, with the Executive Order I am about to sign, we will bring the change that so many scientists and researchers; doctors and innovators; patients and loved ones have hoped for, and fought for, these past eight years: we will lift the ban on federal funding for promising embryonic stem cell research. We will vigorously support scientists who pursue this research. And we will aim for America to lead the world in the discoveries it one day may yield.

At this moment, the full promise of stem cell research remains unknown, and it should not be overstated. But scientists believe these tiny cells may have the potential to help us understand, and possibly cure, some of our most devastating diseases and conditions. To regenerate a severed spinal cord and lift someone from a wheelchair. To spur insulin production and spare a child from a lifetime of needles. To treat Parkinson’s, cancer, heart disease and others that affect millions of Americans and the people who love them.

But that potential will not reveal itself on its own. Medical miracles do not happen simply by accident. They result from painstaking and costly research – from years of lonely trial and error, much of which never bears fruit – and from a government willing to support that work. From life-saving vaccines, to pioneering cancer treatments, to the sequencing of the human genome – that is the story of scientific progress in America. When government fails to make these investments, opportunities are missed. Promising avenues go unexplored. Some of our best scientists leave for other countries that will sponsor their work. And those countries may surge ahead of ours in the advances that transform our lives.

But in recent years, when it comes to stem cell research, rather than furthering discovery, our government has forced what I believe is a false choice between sound science and moral values. In this case, I believe the two are not inconsistent. As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for each other and work to ease human suffering. I believe we have been given the capacity and will to pursue this research – and the humanity and conscience to do so responsibly.

It is a difficult and delicate balance. Many thoughtful and decent people are conflicted about, or strongly oppose, this research. I understand their concerns, and we must respect their point of view.

But after much discussion, debate and reflection, the proper course has become clear. The majority of Americans – from across the political spectrum, and of all backgrounds and beliefs – have come to a consensus that we should pursue this research. That the potential it offers is great, and with proper guidelines and strict oversight, the perils can be avoided.

That is a conclusion with which I agree. That is why I am signing this Executive Order, and why I hope Congress will act on a bi-partisan basis to provide further support for this research. We are joined today by many leaders who have reached across the aisle to champion this cause, and I commend them for that work.

Ultimately, I cannot guarantee that we will find the treatments and cures we seek. No President can promise that. But I can promise that we will seek them – actively, responsibly, and with the urgency required to make up for lost ground. Not just by opening up this new frontier of research today, but by supporting promising research of all kinds, including groundbreaking work to convert ordinary human cells into ones that resemble embryonic stem cells.

I can also promise that we will never undertake this research lightly. We will support it only when it is both scientifically worthy and responsibly conducted. We will develop strict guidelines, which we will rigorously enforce, because we cannot ever tolerate misuse or abuse. And we will ensure that our government never opens the door to the use of cloning for human reproduction. It is dangerous, profoundly wrong, and has no place in our society, or any society.

This Order is an important step in advancing the cause of science in America. But let’s be clear: promoting science isn’t just about providing resources – it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it’s inconvenient – especially when it’s inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda – and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.

By doing this, we will ensure America’s continued global leadership in scientific discoveries and technological breakthroughs. That is essential not only for our economic prosperity, but for the progress of all humanity.

That is why today, I am also signing a Presidential Memorandum directing the head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to develop a strategy for restoring scientific integrity to government decision making. To ensure that in this new Administration, we base our public policies on the soundest science; that we appoint scientific advisors based on their credentials and experience, not their politics or ideology; and that we are open and honest with the American people about the science behind our decisions. That is how we will harness the power of science to achieve our goals – to preserve our environment and protect our national security; to create the jobs of the future, and live longer, healthier lives.

As we restore our commitment to science, and resume funding for promising stem cell research, we owe a debt of gratitude to so many tireless advocates, some of whom are with us today, many of whom are not. Today, we honor all those whose names we don’t know, who organized, and raised awareness, and kept on fighting – even when it was too late for them, or for the people they love. And we honor those we know, who used their influence to help others and bring attention to this cause – people like Christopher and Dana Reeve, who we wish could be here to see this moment.

One of Christopher’s friends recalled that he hung a sign on the wall of the exercise room where he did his grueling regimen of physical therapy. It read: “For everyone who thought I couldn’t do it. For everyone who thought I shouldn’t do it. For everyone who said, ‘It’s impossible.’ See you at the finish line.”

Christopher once told a reporter who was interviewing him: “If you came back here in ten years, I expect that I’d walk to the door to greet you.”

Christopher did not get that chance. But if we pursue this research, maybe one day – maybe not in our lifetime, or even in our children’s lifetime – but maybe one day, others like him might.

There is no finish line in the work of science. The race is always with us – the urgent work of giving substance to hope and answering those many bedside prayers, of seeking a day when words like “terminal” and “incurable” are finally retired from our vocabulary.

Today, using every resource at our disposal, with renewed determination to lead the world in the discoveries of this new century, we rededicate ourselves to this work.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless America."


On a personal note:

In 2004, I lived in Chicago. Illinois State Senator Obama did not know me when I supported him in his race for the U.S. Senate.

In 2007, U.S. Senator Obama did not know me when I volunteered as an Obama precinct captain in Nevada during his campaign for the Democratic nomination for President.

In 2008, U.S. Senator and Democratic Presidential nominee Obama did not know me as I continued to support his candidacy for President.

In 2009, President Obama does not know me. He does not know how this Executive Order has moved me to the very core of my being. But in his heart, I suspect he knows how many lives he has touched.

And I know him. He is a man of vision and honor, and represents hope on so many levels.

Thank you, Mr. President. At the risk of being overly repetitive, your legacy - personal, local, national, and international, is now assured.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

We've debated it many times, but you and I both agree to disagree on the economic ideals of Republicans vs. Democrats.

That said, I actually am happy with this because I can't stand how Republicans want to be the morality police. The Church and other "moral majority" nutjobs are acting like we'll be growing every single one of these embryos into people one day when we're never going to. If these embryos aren't ever going to be used, they ought to be martyred to some good cause instead of dying of freezer burn.

thinker said...

Well said. I have already seen the Catholic church attacking Obama's Executive Order on stem cell research.

I too struggle with the concept of when life begins. Also, do we have a soul? If so, at what point does it get 'attached' to us?

What we do know is that many unused embryos are literally thrown into medical waste bins. Isn't that a moral wrong?

For the sake of argument, maybe using such embryos for stem cells is the lesser of two evils. But given that those embryos have already been created, isn't 'lesser evil' the better choice?

Wayne in Pa said...

I don't believe the research that will now be allowed using stem cells is evil in any way, shape, or form. So I do not see the need to use the phrase "lesser evil" in connection with this subject.

thinker said...

I agree with you that stem cell research is not evil in any way.

I prefaced that comment with "For the sake of argument..."

Wayne in Pa said...

Point noted. You'll get no argument from me.