Friday, September 26, 2008

Chubby Checker and Cable TV Weakened Society

Outrageous title? Or bold truth?

Before Chubby Checker's version of The Twist became a phenomenon, reaching #1 on the Billboard Hot 100 on September 19, 1960, dancing involved two people actually holding each other, looking into each other's eyes, and moving together as a team across a dance floor. A necessary skill was the need to avoid bumping into other 'teams,' giving them the requisite space to achieve the broader goal of a successful dance floor. When the occasional bumping between teams occurred, social interaction on another level took place. Apologies and smiles ensued, and people moved on together, embracing one other.

The Twist started a trend that continues today: non-contact dancing. Individual expression without the counterbalance of meeting your partner's needs. Dancing with a partner became dancing with someone who had became of secondary interest and concern. What's the point? Perhaps non-contact dancing was an expression of general alienation that people were beginning to feel. The pace of society was speeding up. The Cold War threatened the destruction not only of countries, but of civilization itself. The perception was that the End Was Near. Were people afraid to connect emotionally, as the world may not exist much longer? Or did people just become more selfish?

Before cable and satellite TV systems became popular, with their dozens, and then hundreds of channels, in the USA you had the choice of ABC, CBS, NBC, maybe a PBS station, and if you were lucky, an independent station. When you went to work, school, or socialized with friends, it was highly likely that you watched at least one program the prior night that other people in your group had also watched. You discussed the pros and cons of plots, acting, and the latest commercials. There was a social bond. If politics and religion were off-limit subjects due to their controversial nature, you could always opine on The Twilight Zone, Gunsmoke, Mission Impossible, MASH, or I Dream of Jeannie. Sharing views like this provided a safe zone, and a socially acceptable way to interact, even with those folks you barely knew.

Cable TV changed all that. I first noticed this trend in the 1980s. A group of coworkers was sitting in our company's break room. Someone walked in and mentioned that he had just gotten cable TV. 35 channels! Better reception! We all oohed and ahed. Then the discussion returned to the latest developments on Dallas, The Cosby Show, or Star Search. Our cable TV guy did not participate. He had watched channels none of us had even heard of. Within a few years, we all had at least basic cable with about 60 channels. The break room discussions were more narrow. Few people watched the same shows. Those that did share that experience tended to cluster near one another for their essentially private talks. The encroaching isolation and lack of common interest was very evident. We had again chosen self over group. I'm just as guilty. I recently subscribed to the HBO package.

Maybe a partial answer lies in another technological revolution. In an odd twist, the Internet has ridden to the rescue. Now fans of TV shows can share their thoughts in a global meeting room, not just a company's break room. But at what cost? Sitting at a keyboard and screen, even with cameras, does not replace person-to-person interaction.

The Internet giveth, and the Internet taketh away. But that's a subject for another week.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

If you think everyone does non-contact dancing these days, you obviously haven't been in a nightclub lately. Like some old lady who headed some watchdog group said on TV, "It's like they're having sex with clothes on."

Unless you're looking for something that isn't offered on DVD a few months down the road, I never thought cable TV was worth it. I barely watched the "thirteen channels of shit" of national TV (as Pink Floyd calls it) when getting into my late teens.

thinker said...

I know about the "It's like they're having sex with clothes on." 'dancing.' A somewhat more mild form was known as 'slow dancing' back in the day. My main reference was to the kind of dancing done between two partners who (1) are still in the getting-to-know each other phase, or (2) those who are not into extreme public displays of 'affection', which I think represented the majority. That was what was affected by the non-contact dancing craze, and what was indicative of larger cultural issues.

Wayne in Pa said...

Dancing and contact. Maybe that is why "Dancing with the Stars" is so popular. The Dancers are contacting and I guess looking into each others eyes, and people are living vicariously through these dancers. (I have never watched the program). Ballroom dancing is also very popular.

At first I thought I understood where you were going with this but you seem to have gone off on a number of tangents, and trying to weave a number of thoughts into one. I kind of get it but it is scary.

All I can say to bfoxy is THANK GOD FOR CABLE TV!!!!!! Discovery Channel (Planet Earth, World's Deadliest Catch, Dirty Jobs, etc), The History Channel (The Presidents, The States, Etc), The Travel Channel, TLC, FX, (The Shield), AMC (Mad Men), and I also get PBS.

There is some exceptional programing to be viewed. I look for folks to discuss the content of some of these shows but the problem is too many dimwits are watching "Survivor" and other mindless reality programing. Just watch a couple of segments of the Discovery Channels' "Cash Cab" where people are asked to answer general knowledge questions to win cash.

There are a lot of folks out in the States of America with no general knowledge.

Hey, if you can ramble on and on so can I!!!!!

Anonymous said...

To Wayne in PA: you're right about the reality TV. They're not even real. The "contestants" are mostly out of work no-name actors and much of the controversy is staged.

thinker said...

Thank you both for your comments. About 90% of this week's blog was written with tongue planted firmly in cheek.

Speaking of 90%, science fiction writer Theodore Sturgeon was once asked if he thought that 90% of science fiction is crap. His response, now affectionately known as 'Sturgeon's Law,' was, "90% of EVERYTHING is crap."

It is a Law, and must be obeyed. Therefore, since the number of TV channels, movies, et cetera have expanded at a rate exceeding the speed at which the universe is expanding (oops, I forgot... no universe... you're all just part of a nightmare I'm having... and my celestial alarm clock is about to ring), then the 10% of 'non-crap,' in raw numbers, has increased as well.

I will forever be beholden to bfoxy for recommending 'Firefly,' and to wayne in pa for recommending 'The Shield' as well as other shows too numerous to mention. And when I wake up, I'll remember you both fondly.

Anonymous said...

It just dawned on me on the way to work today: There's been plenty of popular non-contact dances before "The Twist" such as some variations of "The Charleston".

thinker said...

The Charleston is an interesting example. According to Wikipedia, "Despite its black history, Charleston is most frequently associated with white flappers and the speakeasy. Here, these young women would dance alone or together as a way of mocking the "drys," or citizens who supported the Prohibition amendment, as Charleston was then considered quite immoral and provocative." A dance with political overtones.

Yet the Charleston did not influence the dance floors like the Twist did. Some Twist progeny included: The Frug, Watusi, Mashed Potato, Monster Mash, Hitch-Hike, Monkey, Chicken, Swim, Blue-Beat, Pony, Madison, Block, Shake, Dog, Ska, Locomotion, et al.

Jerry Seinfeld said it best. When asked why he doesn't dance, he replied, "Ummm... because it's stupid?"

Anonymous said...

I can agree with Bfoxy there is Shit on Cable.....I am going to subscribe to netflix screw Cable...LOL OMG BBQ

Anonymous said...

Yeah, most of the worthwhile shows on cable hit DVD anyhow. The only shows I watch on cable that aren't on DVD are news (obviously) and John Stewert and Stephen Colbert (and I wouldn't be distraught if I couldn't watch them anymore).

Anonymous said...

I might also add, DVDs are commercial free! And if the bastards try to sneak them in anyway, SKIP EM with VLC!

thinker said...

Good tip on VLC. I had never heard of it. I once had a 'commercial skipper' feature on a VCR. It was a button on the remote that did a 60 second fast forward and then returned to 'play'.